What were 2 arguments against dropping the atomic bomb?
Those who oppose the bombings argue it was militarily unnecessary, inherently immoral, a war crime, or a form of state terrorism. Critics believe a naval blockade and conventional bombings would have forced Japan to surrender unconditionally.
Truman stated that his decision to drop the bomb was purely military. A Normandy-type amphibious landing would have cost an estimated million casualties. Truman believed that the bombs saved Japanese lives as well. Prolonging the war was not an option for the President.
Some have argued in favor of the use of the bombs for a range of reasons, including: it ended the war, it saved the lives of millions, and it was necessary for the emerging Cold War with the Soviet Union.
Combined with the Soviet entry into the conflict, the atom bombs brought about Japan's surrender within a few days. The bomb was necessary to accomplish Truman's primary objectives of forcing a prompt Japanese surrender and saving American lives, perhaps thousands of them.
The U.S was justified in dropping atomic bombs as it was an alternative to end the war at an instance and to also prevent the death rate of civilians. This was also necessary as it was America's desire to shorten the war if the Japanese surrendered.
The dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was justified at the time as being moral – in order to bring about a more rapid victory and prevent the deaths of more Americans. However, it was clearly not moral to use this weapon knowing that it would kill civilians and destroy the urban milieu.
In order to avoid such a high casualty rate, Truman decided–over the moral reservations of Secretary of War Henry Stimson, General Dwight Eisenhower and a number of the Manhattan Project scientists–to use the atomic bomb in the hopes of bringing the war to a quick end.
Which argument led the United States to use the atomic bomb during World War II? An invasion of Japan would cost hundreds of thousands of American lives. Which is true of World War II?
- Japan was ready to call for a truce and a demonstration would be enough for the Japanese authorities to decide to surrender. The arguments against the demonstration of the bomb: - There were only two nuclear bombs ready and not using them effectively, Japanese might still think they have chance and continue the war.
which of the following is a common argument against the U.S. decision to drop the Atomic bomb ? The Japanese were more willing to surrender than the U.S. military thought.
What was an argument used in favor of dropping atomic bombs on Japan apex?
What was an argument used in favor of dropping atomic bombs on Japan? It would prevent high casualties that would be caused by an invasion of Mainland Japan.
The Hiroshima Pilot Who Became a Symbol of Antinuclear Protest. Claude Eatherly spent years punishing himself for his role in the first atomic bombing. His remorse made him an international celebrity. As a subscriber, you have 10 gift articles to give each month.